TrustCloud
One Trusted Ecosystem
In an increasingly interconnected digital landscape, the battle for trust takes center stage. TrustCloud emerges as a revolutionary ecosystem designed to counteract corruption, fraud, and digital authoritarianism. By leveraging cutting-edge solutions like decentralized identity management, AI-enhanced encryption, and self-sovereign technology, TrustCloud provides a secure, human-centric platform where individuals, businesses, and communities can thrive. It is a call to action—a commitment to building a safer, more transparent, and decentralized internet where trust is the foundation of every interaction.
The Silent Threat to the Internet
Corruption has quietly become a far greater threat to the Internet than fraud, challenging its openness and integrity. From digital authoritarianism to surveillance capitalism and state-sponsored data exploitation, systemic practices are reshaping the online world under the guise of security and progress. This issue not only undermines trust but also erodes fundamental freedoms and privacy. Learn more about these pressing challenges and their global impact in our newly created section dedicated to exploring solutions and raising awareness about this critical issue.
The Threat of Digital Totalitarianism:
Mass Surveillance in Democracies
Digital totalitarianism practices are not exclusive to authoritarian regimes but are also present in democratic nations, including the U.S. and European countries. Governments worldwide employ digital surveillance tools, ostensibly for national security and public safety.
Mass Surveillance and Data Collection:
Digital totalitarianism practices are not exclusive to authoritarian regimes but are also present in democratic nations, including the U.S. and European countries. Governments worldwide employ digital surveillance tools, ostensibly for national security and public safety.
COVID-19 and Emergency Surveillance:
During the COVID-19 pandemic, countries across the globe, including democratic states, introduced tracking and surveillance measures to monitor public health. For example, several European countries implemented contact-tracing apps and, in some cases, required geolocation tracking to enforce quarantine measures. In Australia, home quarantine was enforced using facial recognition and geolocation tracking, sparking privacy concerns despite government assurances that the data would eventually be deleted.
Facial Recognition and Biometric Data Collection:
Both the U.S. and European nations have incorporated facial recognition technology into security operations, often with minimal regulation. Police departments in the U.S. have used tools like Clearview AI, which scrapes images from the internet to identify people, raising privacy concerns. In France, the use of facial recognition at airports and in public spaces is controversial, with civil rights advocates warning of potential misuse.
Big Tech Under Scrutiny:
Protecting Children’s Privacy and Well-being
The application of these technologies often blurs the line between security and privacy, leading to a form of digital authoritarianism even in democratic settings. Critics argue that the spread of surveillance technology, without robust checks and balances, could erode civil liberties and normalize surveillance practices.
LEADING TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANY
A major technology company, known for its popular social media platforms, was sued by 33 U.S. states and 9 attorneys general for allegedly designing addictive platforms that harm children’s mental health and collecting data from children under 13 without parental consent, violating COPPA, despite claiming safety improvements.
A LEADING VIDEO PLATFORM
On the internet, known for hosting user-generated content and being globally accessible, was fined $170 million by the FTC in 2019. It was accused of collecting data from children under the age of 13 without parental consent and using this information to serve targeted ads, prompting regulatory actions.
SHORT-VIDEO SOCIAL NETWORK
Created in China and popular for its viral content and large base of young users, was investigated in 2021 by the UK government. The investigation examined how the platform collects and manages data from minors to ensure strict compliance with child data protection regulations.
VIRTUAL ASSISTANT OF MAJOR ECOMMERCE
A virtual assistant widely used in smart home devices, developed by a leading e-commerce platform, was sued in 2019 for recording children’s voices without consent. The case raised concerns about child privacy and the use of collected data in its digital commerce ecosystem.
LEADING TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANY
A major technology company, known for its popular social media platforms, was sued by 33 U.S. states and 9 attorneys general for allegedly designing addictive platforms that harm children’s mental health and collecting data from children under 13 without parental consent, violating COPPA, despite claiming safety improvements.
A LEADING VIDEO PLATFORM
On the internet, known for hosting user-generated content and being globally accessible, was fined $170 million by the FTC in 2019. It was accused of collecting data from children under the age of 13 without parental consent and using this information to serve targeted ads, prompting regulatory actions.
SHORT-VIDEO SOCIAL NETWORK
Created in China and popular for its viral content and large base of young users, was investigated in 2021 by the UK government. The investigation examined how the platform collects and manages data from minors to ensure strict compliance with child data protection regulations.
VIRTUAL ASSISTANT OF MAJOR ECOMMERCE
A virtual assistant widely used in smart home devices, developed by a leading e-commerce platform, was sued in 2019 for recording children’s voices without consent. The case raised concerns about child privacy and the use of collected data in its digital commerce ecosystem.
These cases highlight a growing push for tech accountability in safeguarding peoples and children’s online privacy.
The battle between the defenders and aggressors in the digital space is fundamentally over TRUST.
Our kids are not SAFE
Internet is not SAFE
We are not SAFE
And we need a SAFE place, a SAFE CLOUD, a CLOUD that we can TRUST to freely transact online.
That’s why we created TrustCloud, a Project in which any humanistic tech company is welcomed. An ecosystem of TRUST.
CHOREOGRAPHER FOR SECURE DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS
(DECENTRILIZED ORCHESTRATOR)
2024
AI + ENCRYPTION & SSI
2024/2025
END USER & MARKETPLACE
2025/2026
TELCO IDPS, OWN DATA CENTER (ON PREMISE) TRUSTCLOUD ATMOSPHERE
2026/2027
SELF SOVEREIGN
PROPERTY
2027/2028
A TRUSTCLOUD is needed
DESCENTRILIZED MEDICINE
DESCENTRILIZED IDENTITY
DESCENTRILIZED PROPIETRY
The Risks of Centralized Identity: A Call for Change
Centralized identity solutions promise seamless access to services, but at what cost? By storing sensitive data like biometrics and Social Security numbers in centralized systems, these platforms create single points of failure, making them attractive targets for breaches. Users face privacy risks, inequities due to biases in technologies like facial recognition, and frustrations with limited accessibility. There’s a better way forward.
Building a Resilient Cloud Ecosystem for True Digital Sovereignty
Imagine a digital identity system where you are in control. A resilient cloud ecosystem rooted in Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) empowers individuals with privacy, autonomy, and security, breaking free from centralized authorities. By leveraging cutting-edge technologies like decentralized storage, cryptographic security, and transparent governance, SSI ensures that your personal data remains yours—secure, private, and always under your control.
TrustCloud: A Decentralized Approach to Digital Freedom
To ensure that TrustCloud remains free speech and censorship-resistant and independent, it would need to integrate several core strategies and technologies designed to counter centralized control and censorship efforts:
Decentralized Hosting and Content Distribution
- Decentralized Storage Networks: By leveraging decentralized storage networks like IPFS or Storj, TrustCloud can distribute data across nodes worldwide, making it extremely difficult for a single entity to block access entirely.
- Blockchain-Based Domain Name System (DNS): Traditional DNS is vulnerable to censorship because governments can mandate blocking at the DNS level. A decentralized DNS (like ENS on Ethereum) provides an alternative where domain control is distributed, making it harder to seize or block domains by central authority action.
Content and Data Encryption
- Client-Side Encryption for Content: Encrypting all user content before it is uploaded ensures that only the user and authorized parties can view the content, shielding it from any potential interception or scrutiny. Even if certain nodes or infrastructure providers attempt to filter content, encrypted data would be indecipherable without user consent.
- Confidential Computing for Processing: This technology enables encrypted data processing without revealing its contents to the host infrastructure. TrustCloud could implement this for enhanced privacy and to avoid content censorship.
Peer-to-Peer Communication Protocols
- Decentralized Social Media Models: By hosting social applications on peer-to-peer protocols (such as Secure Scuttlebutt or the ActivityPub protocol), TrustCloud users can communicate and share without relying on centralized servers that can be censored. Platforms like Mastodon, which run on ActivityPub, demonstrate how federated networks resist central control.
- Mesh Networking: In case of internet censorship or blocking, mesh networking allows devices to connect directly to each other, bypassing central internet infrastructure. Mesh networks have been used in areas with internet blackouts to maintain communication.
Transparent Governance and Community-Driven Moderation
- DAO-Based Governance: Using Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) within TrustCloud can put decision-making in the hands of the community. DAOs can establish transparent, democratic rules for content management that reflect the consensus of all users rather than an imposed top-down approach.
- Open Moderation Frameworks: Instead of algorithmic censorship by an opaque authority, moderation could be community-driven, with users voting on content guidelines and moderation actions. This reduces the risk of arbitrary content removal by a single controlling party.
Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) for Access Control
- Identity Without Central Authentication: Using SSI enables users to authenticate themselves without relying on traditional identity providers, like major tech companies, which could restrict access based on political or regulatory pressures.
- Anonymous or Pseudonymous Interaction: TrustCloud can support pseudonymous identity systems where users maintain reputational scores without revealing personally identifiable information, reducing the risk of censorship due to identity-based profiling.
Interoperable Protocols for Ecosystem Resilience
- Cross-Platform Interoperability: TrustCloud should support interoperability with other decentralized networks, enabling users to move their data and identities freely across platforms. This minimizes the risk of being locked out or censored within one ecosystem by allowing users to port content and connections elsewhere.
End-User Empowerment Through Transparency Tools
- User-Controlled Privacy Dashboards: TrustCloud would offer users complete transparency over how their data is managed, shared, or requested by any entity.
- Decentralized Access Logs: By maintaining decentralized logs of data access requests (stored on a blockchain), TrustCloud could ensure users are informed whenever third parties attempt to view or control their data, making it difficult for censorship attempts to go unnoticed.
These approaches collectively create a cloud ecosystem that prioritizes individual control, decentralization, and resistance to centralized censorship pressures, aligning with the vision of a censorship-resistant TrustCloud.
Humanistic Tech Companies
At TrustCloud, we highlight technology companies that places people at the center of its purpose. These companies represent an exceptional balance between technological innovation and humanistic principles, demonstrating that it is possible to create solutions that not only transform industries but also contribute to social well-being and global trust. Their commitment to ethical practices, inclusion, and positive impact aligns with our vision of a world where technology serves a fairer and more connected future.
Wester Union
Connecting people and businesses globally through secure and accessible money transfer services.
ThoughtWorks
Driving digital transformation with innovative technology and a focus on social and ethical impact.
Wistia
Empowering brands with customized video marketing solutions and authentic storytelling.
Monzo
Reimagining digital banking with transparency, accessibility, and user-centered innovation.
Fairphone
Designing modular, ethical devices to promote social justice and reduce environmental impact.
IDEO
Solving complex challenges through human-centered design and collaborative innovation.
Gigaset
Enabling communication with reliable, intuitive technology built on German quality standards.
TheTrustCloud.org ©